The doctoral thesis something that is beyond the scope of this work.30. Now very significantly Nueva Sociedad did not take up Betancourts words or those of Haya de la Torre. A sign of the moment. She seemed more interested in what was in fact the future of social democracy than in what the glorious past could still comment on. Neither of the two historical players would survive the Conference for long. that in this sense it is necessary to highlight very significantly the Caracas Conference had the long and perhaps a bit ostentatious title of Meeting of political leaders of Europe and America in favor of international democratic solidarity.
It was not even remotely a free name. For all Ecuador Phone Number Latin American parties that for decades have been fighting for freedom democracy and social progress as Brandt said he immediately referred to the two Pro Democracy and Freedom congresses Havana 1950 Maracay 1960 organized as has been said by the socalled Caribbean democratic left so reluctant to be part of any international. After the dissolution of Aprista as a continental movement all these parties emphasized their difference with the communists emphasizing that they responded to the specific specifications of their countries not even IndoAmerica an Aprista category that was never very popular in the Caribbean due to its obvious exclusion of Afrodescendant populations and that there was no way they were going to move from American imperialism which they resisted but with which they could somehow negotiate to Soviet imperialism. Such had been fundamental principles of Betancourt and AD.
The InterAmerican Association for Democracy and Freedom never had a centralizing objective nor a functioning as far as it has been possible to determine that was too practical except to be a bridge with the American Democratic Party which is not a small thing.31. In the context of the harshest period.