All justice professionals and judicial bodies and Prosecutor's Offices are obliged to use the telematic systems existing in the Administration of Justice for the presentation of writings and documents and the performance of acts of procedural communication, as as established since the reform of Law /, of January , on Civil Procedure. The Lexnet system does not alter the calculation of procedural deadlines but the articles that regulate the matter in the LEC must be taken into account, and, especially, the different circumstances contemplated in article LEC to understand when the notification by electronic means and when the calculation of procedural deadlines begins. The art. of the LEC establishes that, if, despite the correct sending of the notification, three days pass without the recipient (lawyer) accessing its content, it will be understood that the communication has been made legally, fully displaying its effects . First of all, it must be taken into account that we are dealing with a period of days, and therefore, these three days are business days . Secondly and, in accordance with the provisions of art. of the CC, since it is a period indicated by days, counting from a certain day, this is excluded from the calculation; That is, the day on which the notification was received is not counted within the three-day period.
Thirdly, for the purposes of being notified - in this case the lawyer -, if the three days elapse, the fourth is the dies a quo from which the communication fully deploys its Canada Mobile Number List effects. Regarding the day of grace, we must confirm that this is maintained with Lexnet, but we must bear in mind that the -hour rule of art. for telematic presentation, since since it is a grace period, art. of the LEC cites that: “The presentation of writings and documents, whatever the form, if subject to a deadline, may be carried out until fifteen hours on the business day following the expiration of the deadline. ” Finally, we can remain calm, with respect to what the month of August refers to since, for judicial purposes, no acts of communication will be carried out to professionals by electronic means, unless they are competent for the corresponding actions. of TRLSRU /, which understands them to be initiated when the execution of the urbanization works begins, after the approval of all the planning and execution instruments required by the legislation. Beginning, which is also presumed when there is an administrative or notarial document that attests to the beginning of the works. Likewise, if this start is conditional on the approval and effectiveness of the planning and execution instruments, its expiration causes the land to be restored to the initial situation of the action.
Its completion, it will be understood to be explicit when the urban development works are completed and the duties have been satisfied and the corresponding charges have been lifted and presumed at the time of “reception of the works by the Administration or, failing that, at the end of the period in which receipt should have occurred from your request accompanied by certification issued by the technical management of the works. Furthermore, we must not fail to consider that, as resolved by the STS of February , (rec./), which admitted an appeal in its FD when appreciating, until the modification of the LJCA through the Organic Law /, of July , which had the objective of introducing into the contentious-administrative jurisdiction the data or criterion of "cassation interest" and eliminating the regulation of cassation appeals for the unification of doctrine and cassation appeals in the interest of the law, objective cassational interest, and the convenience of a ruling from this Third Chamber of the Supreme Court in order to determine, if.