Specially given the approval of municipal accounts by control bodies. The vote indicates that the case must return to the court of second instance and be analyzed taking into account the approval of the accounts by the City Council. Extend the retroactivity of the law The divergence opened by Minister Regina Helena Costa understands that the rapporteur's proposal unduly expands the retroactivity of the new Improbity Law, as established by the Federal Supreme Court , in a thesis set in August 2022. For the STF, the new law only applies to cases prior to it that involve a culpable act of improbity without a definitive conviction. In intentional cases, the law does not apply retroactively. For the minister, the TJ-MG made it clear in its ruling that there was intent in the conduct of the former mayor of Minas Gerais. "My concern is that, when it comes to fraud, given the interpretation given in Theme 1,199, there is no question of talking about retroactivity.
And it is precisely this disagreement that we are having. The STF, in monocratic decisions by ministers applying this guidance, makes it clear that, when it comes to fraud, there is this situation of not being able to extend retroactivity", he argued, this Tuesday.Consumer Seeing signs of violation of the right to information provided for in the Consumer Protection Code, the 27th Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Ju Chinese American Phone Number List stice of São Paulo determined that Companhia Paulista de Força e Luz (CPFL) reestablish the delivery of printed invoices to units consumers who did not expressly adhere to the digital invoice model in the municipality of Barretos. Marcello Casal/Agência Brasil Marcello Casal/Agência Brasil CPFL will have to send paper bills to consumers in the city of Barretos The TJ-SP confirmed the injunction granted in the first instance and also maintained the daily fine of R$5,000, limited to R$100,000, if the company does not resume sending printed invoices within 15 days.

The decision was made in a public civil action filed by the São Paulo Public Defender's Office. According to the records, at least 8,246 consumers of the company in Barretos stopped receiving their monthly electricity consumption bills in printed form, as they had tacitly agreed to the digital bill, as provided for in Aneel Resolution 928/2021, which did not is more in force. Subsequently, several consumers contacted the Public Defender's Office to report dissatisfaction with the change and said that CPFL did not inform them about the possibility of returning to the printed invoice, violating the Consumer Protection Code. The Defender's Office recalled that, with the publication of Municipal Law 6,287/2022, the tacit waiver of sending printed invoices was prohibited. The rapporteur, judge Sergio Alfieri, recognized that customers were not adequately informed about the change to the digital invoice, which violates the duty of information established in the CDC and puts the consumer at an exacerbated disadvantage, as it demands of them, to obtain the invoice for checking and payment, traveling to the company's service center to request a copy.